Skip to content
3 min read international relations

The "Madman Theory": a psychological manipulation strategy

Geopolitics is a game of influence, perception, and deterrence. Some leaders cultivate an image of unpredictability to instill fear, forcing their opponents to tread carefully, unsure of how far they are willing to go. This is the essence of the Madman Theory

The "Madman Theory": a psychological manipulation strategy

Is it still truly relevant in 2025?

Geopolitics is a game of influence, perception, and deterrence.

Some leaders cultivate an image of unpredictability to instill fear, forcing their opponents to tread carefully, unsure of how far they are willing to go.

This is the essence of the Madman Theory, a strategy made famous by Richard Nixon.

But is this tactic still effective today?
Or have modern strategists found a more advancedmore sophisticated way to dominate their adversaries without ever raising their voices?

Let’s break down this psychological manipulation technique and explore how it is being pushed to its limits in the 21st century.

The Madman theory: the art of strategic manipulation

Definition and origins

The Madman Theory is a strategy where a leader pretends to be irrational and unpredictable to create fear and uncertainty in the minds of their adversaries.
The goal is simple:

This approach became famous under Richard Nixon during the Vietnam War.
He and his National Security Advisor, Kissinger, wanted North Vietnam and the Soviet Union to believe that Nixon was capable of anything if they did not cooperate.

This strategy is rooted in psychological warfare and even ancient military philosophy.

Sun Tzu, the legendary Chinese strategist, once wrote:
"Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak."

The Madman Theory takes this to the extreme:
"Appear insane when you are in control."

The psychology behind the strategy

The Madman Theory exploits several key psychological principles:

But while this worked during the Cold War, does it still work today?

Is the “Madman Theory” outdated?

The world has changed. We no longer live in a simple bipolar system where two superpowers play chess.

Today, the game is digital, global, and controlled by data, artificial intelligence, and cognitive warfare.

The problem with the Madman Theory is that it leaves too much room for doubt.

In the 21st century, the most powerful leaders do not want to appear unpredictable. They want to be unreadable.

From chaos to total opacity

Modern leaders no longer rely on chaotic behavior to intimidate their enemies.
They rely on deep control and strategic invisibility.

Look at some modern examples:

In today’s world, the goal is not to be unpredictable, it’s to be unknowable.

The age of Deep Control

If unpredictability is no longer the ultimate weapon, then what is?
The complete control of perception.

The most powerful strategists of the future will not appear crazy.
They will appear impossible to read.

The four pillars of Deep Control

This new approach to manipulation is based on four key elements:

Information asymmetry – Controlling what your opponent knows, and more importantly, what they think they know.
Signal overload – Sending contradictory messages to keep adversaries confused.
Cognitive warfare – Flooding the enemy’s mind with so much conflicting information that they can’t form a clear response.
Total inaccessibility – Never letting anyone understand your true motives.

This is not about "looking dangerous" anymore.
It is about "never letting them see you coming."

This is no longer about "playing crazy."
This is about making sure no one ever sees the full picture.

The end of the Madman Theory = the rise of the “Master Strategist”

The Madman Theory belonged to the 20th century. It worked in a world where communication was slow, where nations were playing a clear game of deterrence.

But today, unpredictability alone is a weakness.

The leaders of the future will not be loud.
They will not be obvious.
They will be unreadable.

The real question is:
Do you still want to play the "crazy" game?
Or do you want to be the one writing the rules?

Because in the 21st century, power does not belong to the one who looks dangerous. It belongs to the one who no one truly understands.