Skip to content
4 min read STRATEGIC ANALYSIS

Why you should never fully trust a journalist (by an ex-journalist)

After crossing over into intelligence, I realized how easily journalists are played by sources, by ego, by the system itself.

Why you should never fully trust a journalist (by an ex-journalist)

I used to believe journalists were objective.

After all, I was one.

I had - like many entering the field - this romanticized illusion that journalists were driven by the pursuit of truth.

But my transition from journalism to intelligence opened my eyes to a disturbing reality: journalists are far more vulnerable to manipulation than they think.


TL;DR

  1. The hidden relation: journalist and its sources
  2. Why journalists fall into the asymmetric trap
  3. Journalists as intelligence assets
  4. What happens when media narratives drift far from reality?
  5. Behind headlines are often boring human errors
  6. Can manipulation be avoided?
  7. A call to journalists: embrace accountability!

The hidden relationship: journalist and sources

Every investigative journalist relies heavily on their sources.

To write compelling stories, journalists cultivate strong relationships with people in power: politicians, business leaders, insiders.

But there's a dark side to it.

When a source proactively approaches a journalist with a "scoop", it's NEVER, EVER... innocent.

There's always an underlying agenda: political influence, economic interests, personal interest...

I saw this firsthand when an influential source fed a leading journalist information about key geopolitical figures.

The journalist jumped on it, unaware they were being manipulated to create pressure on those targeted individuals.

Journalists become tools of coercion.


Why journalists fall into this trap

Ego: the journalist's achilles heel